Python Breast Cancer using Decision Tree

Article Creation Date : 09-Oct-2021 09:18:51 PM

            PYTHON BREAST CANCER PREDICTION                         USING DECISION TREEPython Breast Cancer prediction is a simple project in python which is used to classify 
whether the person is having breast cancer or not i.e. by classifying the given data into
malignant or benign. This project is built using Decision Tree classifier i.e. the model is 
trained using Decision Tree and achieved an accuracy of 95%. If the output is malignant
then the person is suffering from breast cancer, if not then the person does not have breast
cancer.

CODE:
In [25]:
import pandas as pd
In [26]:
import numpy as np
In [27]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
In [28]:
import seaborn as sns
In [29]:
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
In [30]:
cancer=load_breast_cancer()
cancer
Out[30]:
{'data': array([[1.799e+01, 1.038e+01, 1.228e+02, ..., 2.654e-01, 4.601e-01,
         1.189e-01],
        [2.057e+01, 1.777e+01, 1.329e+02, ..., 1.860e-01, 2.750e-01,
         8.902e-02],
        [1.969e+01, 2.125e+01, 1.300e+02, ..., 2.430e-01, 3.613e-01,
         8.758e-02],
        ...,
        [1.660e+01, 2.808e+01, 1.083e+02, ..., 1.418e-01, 2.218e-01,
         7.820e-02],
        [2.060e+01, 2.933e+01, 1.401e+02, ..., 2.650e-01, 4.087e-01,
         1.240e-01],
        [7.760e+00, 2.454e+01, 4.792e+01, ..., 0.000e+00, 2.871e-01,
         7.039e-02]]),
 'target': array([0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
        0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
        0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0,
        0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
        0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
        0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
        0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0,
        0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,
        1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]),
 'target_names': array(['malignant', 'benign'], dtype='<U9'),
 'DESCR': '.. _breast_cancer_dataset:\n\nBreast cancer wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset\n--------------------------------------------\n\n**Data Set Characteristics:**\n\n    :Number of Instances: 569\n\n    :Number of Attributes: 30 numeric, predictive attributes and the class\n\n    :Attribute Information:\n        - radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)\n        - texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)\n        - perimeter\n        - area\n        - smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)\n        - compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)\n        - concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)\n        - concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)\n        - symmetry \n        - fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)\n\n        The mean, standard error, and "worst" or largest (mean of the three\n        largest values) of these features were computed for each image,\n        resulting in 30 features.  For instance, field 3 is Mean Radius, field\n        13 is Radius SE, field 23 is Worst Radius.\n\n        - class:\n                - WDBC-Malignant\n                - WDBC-Benign\n\n    :Summary Statistics:\n\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n                                           Min    Max\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n    radius (mean):                        6.981  28.11\n    texture (mean):                       9.71   39.28\n    perimeter (mean):                     43.79  188.5\n    area (mean):                          143.5  2501.0\n    smoothness (mean):                    0.053  0.163\n    compactness (mean):                   0.019  0.345\n    concavity (mean):                     0.0    0.427\n    concave points (mean):                0.0    0.201\n    symmetry (mean):                      0.106  0.304\n    fractal dimension (mean):             0.05   0.097\n    radius (standard error):              0.112  2.873\n    texture (standard error):             0.36   4.885\n    perimeter (standard error):           0.757  21.98\n    area (standard error):                6.802  542.2\n    smoothness (standard error):          0.002  0.031\n    compactness (standard error):         0.002  0.135\n    concavity (standard error):           0.0    0.396\n    concave points (standard error):      0.0    0.053\n    symmetry (standard error):            0.008  0.079\n    fractal dimension (standard error):   0.001  0.03\n    radius (worst):                       7.93   36.04\n    texture (worst):                      12.02  49.54\n    perimeter (worst):                    50.41  251.2\n    area (worst):                         185.2  4254.0\n    smoothness (worst):                   0.071  0.223\n    compactness (worst):                  0.027  1.058\n    concavity (worst):                    0.0    1.252\n    concave points (worst):               0.0    0.291\n    symmetry (worst):                     0.156  0.664\n    fractal dimension (worst):            0.055  0.208\n    ===================================== ====== ======\n\n    :Missing Attribute Values: None\n\n    :Class Distribution: 212 - Malignant, 357 - Benign\n\n    :Creator:  Dr. William H. Wolberg, W. Nick Street, Olvi L. Mangasarian\n\n    :Donor: Nick Street\n\n    :Date: November, 1995\n\nThis is a copy of UCI ML Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) datasets.\nhttps://goo.gl/U2Uwz2\n\nFeatures are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle\naspirate (FNA) of a breast mass.  They describe\ncharacteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image.\n\nSeparating plane described above was obtained using\nMultisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, "Decision Tree\nConstruction Via Linear Programming." Proceedings of the 4th\nMidwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society,\npp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear\nprogramming to construct a decision tree.  Relevant features\nwere selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4\nfeatures and 1-3 separating planes.\n\nThe actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane\nin the 3-dimensional space is that described in:\n[K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: "Robust Linear\nProgramming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets",\nOptimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34].\n\nThis database is also available through the UW CS ftp server:\n\nftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu\ncd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WDBC/\n\n.. topic:: References\n\n   - W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian. Nuclear feature extraction \n     for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on \n     Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, volume 1905, pages 861-870,\n     San Jose, CA, 1993.\n   - O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street and W.H. Wolberg. Breast cancer diagnosis and \n     prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43(4), pages 570-577, \n     July-August 1995.\n   - W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian. Machine learning techniques\n     to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Letters 77 (1994) \n     163-171.',
 'feature_names': array(['mean radius', 'mean texture', 'mean perimeter', 'mean area',
        'mean smoothness', 'mean compactness', 'mean concavity',
        'mean concave points', 'mean symmetry', 'mean fractal dimension',
        'radius error', 'texture error', 'perimeter error', 'area error',
        'smoothness error', 'compactness error', 'concavity error',
        'concave points error', 'symmetry error',
        'fractal dimension error', 'worst radius', 'worst texture',
        'worst perimeter', 'worst area', 'worst smoothness',
        'worst compactness', 'worst concavity', 'worst concave points',
        'worst symmetry', 'worst fractal dimension'], dtype='<U23'),
 'filename': 'E:MLlibsite-packagessklearndatasetsdatareast_cancer.csv'}
In [31]:
cancer.keys()
Out[31]:
dict_keys(['data', 'target', 'target_names', 'DESCR', 'feature_names', 'filename'])
DATASET DESCRIPTION
In [32]:
print(cancer["DESCR"])
#Data set description
.. _breast_cancer_dataset:

Breast cancer wisconsin (diagnostic) dataset
--------------------------------------------

**Data Set Characteristics:**

    :Number of Instances: 569

    :Number of Attributes: 30 numeric, predictive attributes and the class

    :Attribute Information:
        - radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)
        - texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)
        - perimeter
        - area
        - smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)
        - compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)
        - concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)
        - concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)
        - symmetry 
        - fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)

        The mean, standard error, and "worst" or largest (mean of the three
        largest values) of these features were computed for each image,
        resulting in 30 features.  For instance, field 3 is Mean Radius, field
        13 is Radius SE, field 23 is Worst Radius.

        - class:
                - WDBC-Malignant
                - WDBC-Benign

    :Summary Statistics:

    ===================================== ====== ======
                                           Min    Max
    ===================================== ====== ======
    radius (mean):                        6.981  28.11
    texture (mean):                       9.71   39.28
    perimeter (mean):                     43.79  188.5
    area (mean):                          143.5  2501.0
    smoothness (mean):                    0.053  0.163
    compactness (mean):                   0.019  0.345
    concavity (mean):                     0.0    0.427
    concave points (mean):                0.0    0.201
    symmetry (mean):                      0.106  0.304
    fractal dimension (mean):             0.05   0.097
    radius (standard error):              0.112  2.873
    texture (standard error):             0.36   4.885
    perimeter (standard error):           0.757  21.98
    area (standard error):                6.802  542.2
    smoothness (standard error):          0.002  0.031
    compactness (standard error):         0.002  0.135
    concavity (standard error):           0.0    0.396
    concave points (standard error):      0.0    0.053
    symmetry (standard error):            0.008  0.079
    fractal dimension (standard error):   0.001  0.03
    radius (worst):                       7.93   36.04
    texture (worst):                      12.02  49.54
    perimeter (worst):                    50.41  251.2
    area (worst):                         185.2  4254.0
    smoothness (worst):                   0.071  0.223
    compactness (worst):                  0.027  1.058
    concavity (worst):                    0.0    1.252
    concave points (worst):               0.0    0.291
    symmetry (worst):                     0.156  0.664
    fractal dimension (worst):            0.055  0.208
    ===================================== ====== ======

    :Missing Attribute Values: None

    :Class Distribution: 212 - Malignant, 357 - Benign

    :Creator:  Dr. William H. Wolberg, W. Nick Street, Olvi L. Mangasarian

    :Donor: Nick Street

    :Date: November, 1995

This is a copy of UCI ML Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Diagnostic) datasets.
https://goo.gl/U2Uwz2

Features are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle
aspirate (FNA) of a breast mass.  They describe
characteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image.

Separating plane described above was obtained using
Multisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, "Decision Tree
Construction Via Linear Programming." Proceedings of the 4th
Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society,
pp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear
programming to construct a decision tree.  Relevant features
were selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4
features and 1-3 separating planes.

The actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane
in the 3-dimensional space is that described in:
[K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: "Robust Linear
Programming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets",
Optimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34].

This database is also available through the UW CS ftp server:

ftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu
cd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WDBC/

.. topic:: References

   - W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian. Nuclear feature extraction 
     for breast tumor diagnosis. IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on 
     Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology, volume 1905, pages 861-870,
     San Jose, CA, 1993.
   - O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street and W.H. Wolberg. Breast cancer diagnosis and 
     prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43(4), pages 570-577, 
     July-August 1995.
   - W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian. Machine learning techniques
     to diagnose breast cancer from fine-needle aspirates. Cancer Letters 77 (1994) 
     163-171.
In [33]:
print(cancer["target"])
#target values
#0 indicates malignant
#1 indicates benign
[0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1
 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0
 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1
 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1]
In [34]:
cancer["target_names"]
#target names
Out[34]:
array(['malignant', 'benign'], dtype='<U9')
In [35]:
cancer["feature_names"]
#feature names
Out[35]:
array(['mean radius', 'mean texture', 'mean perimeter', 'mean area',
       'mean smoothness', 'mean compactness', 'mean concavity',
       'mean concave points', 'mean symmetry', 'mean fractal dimension',
       'radius error', 'texture error', 'perimeter error', 'area error',
       'smoothness error', 'compactness error', 'concavity error',
       'concave points error', 'symmetry error',
       'fractal dimension error', 'worst radius', 'worst texture',
       'worst perimeter', 'worst area', 'worst smoothness',
       'worst compactness', 'worst concavity', 'worst concave points',
       'worst symmetry', 'worst fractal dimension'], dtype='<U23')
In [36]:
cancer["data"].shape
#data shape i.e 569 rows and 30 columns
Out[36]:
(569, 30)
In [37]:
df_cancer=pd.DataFrame(np.c_[cancer["data"],cancer["target"]],columns=np.append(cancer["feature_names"],["target"]))
df_cancer
#data set after forming it into dataframe
Out[37]:
mean radiusmean texturemean perimetermean areamean smoothnessmean compactnessmean concavitymean concave pointsmean symmetrymean fractal dimension...worst textureworst perimeterworst areaworst smoothnessworst compactnessworst concavityworst concave pointsworst symmetryworst fractal dimensiontarget
017.9910.38122.801001.00.118400.277600.300100.147100.24190.07871...17.33184.602019.00.162200.665600.71190.26540.46010.118900.0
120.5717.77132.901326.00.084740.078640.086900.070170.18120.05667...23.41158.801956.00.123800.186600.24160.18600.27500.089020.0
219.6921.25130.001203.00.109600.159900.197400.127900.20690.05999...25.53152.501709.00.144400.424500.45040.24300.36130.087580.0
311.4220.3877.58386.10.142500.283900.241400.105200.25970.09744...26.5098.87567.70.209800.866300.68690.25750.66380.173000.0
420.2914.34135.101297.00.100300.132800.198000.104300.18090.05883...16.67152.201575.00.137400.205000.40000.16250.23640.076780.0
..................................................................
56421.5622.39142.001479.00.111000.115900.243900.138900.17260.05623...26.40166.102027.00.141000.211300.41070.22160.20600.071150.0
56520.1328.25131.201261.00.097800.103400.144000.097910.17520.05533...38.25155.001731.00.116600.192200.32150.16280.25720.066370.0
56616.6028.08108.30858.10.084550.102300.092510.053020.15900.05648...34.12126.701124.00.113900.309400.34030.14180.22180.078200.0
56720.6029.33140.101265.00.117800.277000.351400.152000.23970.07016...39.42184.601821.00.165000.868100.93870.26500.40870.124000.0
5687.7624.5447.92181.00.052630.043620.000000.000000.15870.05884...30.3759.16268.60.089960.064440.00000.00000.28710.070391.0
569 rows %uFFFD 31 columns
In [38]:
sns.pairplot(df_cancer,hue="target",vars=['mean smoothness','mean perimeter','mean texture','mean area','mean radius'])
#pairplots between 5 features mean radius,mean texture,mean perimeter,mean area,mean smoothness
Out[38]:
<seaborn.axisgrid.PairGrid at 0x140f1ebe048>
In [39]:
sns.countplot(df_cancer["target"])
#histogram representing number of 0's and 1's in target
Out[39]:
<matplotlib.axes._subplots.AxesSubplot at 0x140f4635f88>
In [40]:
plt.figure(figsize=(30,10))
sns.heatmap(df_cancer.corr(),annot=True)
#heat map representing corelations between each feature
Out[40]:
<matplotlib.axes._subplots.AxesSubplot at 0x140f468aac8>
In [41]:
x=df_cancer.drop(["target"],axis=1)
x
Out[41]:
mean radiusmean texturemean perimetermean areamean smoothnessmean compactnessmean concavitymean concave pointsmean symmetrymean fractal dimension...worst radiusworst textureworst perimeterworst areaworst smoothnessworst compactnessworst concavityworst concave pointsworst symmetryworst fractal dimension
017.9910.38122.801001.00.118400.277600.300100.147100.24190.07871...25.38017.33184.602019.00.162200.665600.71190.26540.46010.11890
120.5717.77132.901326.00.084740.078640.086900.070170.18120.05667...24.99023.41158.801956.00.123800.186600.24160.18600.27500.08902
219.6921.25130.001203.00.109600.159900.197400.127900.20690.05999...23.57025.53152.501709.00.144400.424500.45040.24300.36130.08758
311.4220.3877.58386.10.142500.283900.241400.105200.25970.09744...14.91026.5098.87567.70.209800.866300.68690.25750.66380.17300
420.2914.34135.101297.00.100300.132800.198000.104300.18090.05883...22.54016.67152.201575.00.137400.205000.40000.16250.23640.07678
..................................................................
56421.5622.39142.001479.00.111000.115900.243900.138900.17260.05623...25.45026.40166.102027.00.141000.211300.41070.22160.20600.07115
56520.1328.25131.201261.00.097800.103400.144000.097910.17520.05533...23.69038.25155.001731.00.116600.192200.32150.16280.25720.06637
56616.6028.08108.30858.10.084550.102300.092510.053020.15900.05648...18.98034.12126.701124.00.113900.309400.34030.14180.22180.07820
56720.6029.33140.101265.00.117800.277000.351400.152000.23970.07016...25.74039.42184.601821.00.165000.868100.93870.26500.40870.12400
5687.7624.5447.92181.00.052630.043620.000000.000000.15870.05884...9.45630.3759.16268.60.089960.064440.00000.00000.28710.07039
569 rows %uFFFD 30 columns
In [42]:
y=df_cancer["target"]
y

	mean radius	mean texture	mean perimeter	mean area	mean smoothness	mean compactness	mean concavity	mean concave points	mean symmetry	mean fractal dimension	...	worst texture	worst perimeter	worst area	worst smoothness	worst compactness	worst concavity	worst concave points	worst symmetry	worst fractal dimension	target
0	17.99	10.38	122.80	1001.0	0.11840	0.27760	0.30010	0.14710	0.2419	0.07871	...	17.33	184.60	2019.0	0.16220	0.66560	0.7119	0.2654	0.4601	0.11890	0.0
1	20.57	17.77	132.90	1326.0	0.08474	0.07864	0.08690	0.07017	0.1812	0.05667	...	23.41	158.80	1956.0	0.12380	0.18660	0.2416	0.1860	0.2750	0.08902	0.0
2	19.69	21.25	130.00	1203.0	0.10960	0.15990	0.19740	0.12790	0.2069	0.05999	...	25.53	152.50	1709.0	0.14440	0.42450	0.4504	0.2430	0.3613	0.08758	0.0
3	11.42	20.38	77.58	386.1	0.14250	0.28390	0.24140	0.10520	0.2597	0.09744	...	26.50	98.87	567.7	0.20980	0.86630	0.6869	0.2575	0.6638	0.17300	0.0
4	20.29	14.34	135.10	1297.0	0.10030	0.13280	0.19800	0.10430	0.1809	0.05883	...	16.67	152.20	1575.0	0.13740	0.20500	0.4000	0.1625	0.2364	0.07678	0.0
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
564	21.56	22.39	142.00	1479.0	0.11100	0.11590	0.24390	0.13890	0.1726	0.05623	...	26.40	166.10	2027.0	0.14100	0.21130	0.4107	0.2216	0.2060	0.07115	0.0
565	20.13	28.25	131.20	1261.0	0.09780	0.10340	0.14400	0.09791	0.1752	0.05533	...	38.25	155.00	1731.0	0.11660	0.19220	0.3215	0.1628	0.2572	0.06637	0.0
566	16.60	28.08	108.30	858.1	0.08455	0.10230	0.09251	0.05302	0.1590	0.05648	...	34.12	126.70	1124.0	0.11390	0.30940	0.3403	0.1418	0.2218	0.07820	0.0
567	20.60	29.33	140.10	1265.0	0.11780	0.27700	0.35140	0.15200	0.2397	0.07016	...	39.42	184.60	1821.0	0.16500	0.86810	0.9387	0.2650	0.4087	0.12400	0.0
568	7.76	24.54	47.92	181.0	0.05263	0.04362	0.00000	0.00000	0.1587	0.05884	...	30.37	59.16	268.6	0.08996	0.06444	0.0000	0.0000	0.2871	0.07039	1.0

	mean radius	mean texture	mean perimeter	mean area	mean smoothness	mean compactness	mean concavity	mean concave points	mean symmetry	mean fractal dimension	...	worst radius	worst texture	worst perimeter	worst area	worst smoothness	worst compactness	worst concavity	worst concave points	worst symmetry	worst fractal dimension
0	17.99	10.38	122.80	1001.0	0.11840	0.27760	0.30010	0.14710	0.2419	0.07871	...	25.380	17.33	184.60	2019.0	0.16220	0.66560	0.7119	0.2654	0.4601	0.11890
1	20.57	17.77	132.90	1326.0	0.08474	0.07864	0.08690	0.07017	0.1812	0.05667	...	24.990	23.41	158.80	1956.0	0.12380	0.18660	0.2416	0.1860	0.2750	0.08902
2	19.69	21.25	130.00	1203.0	0.10960	0.15990	0.19740	0.12790	0.2069	0.05999	...	23.570	25.53	152.50	1709.0	0.14440	0.42450	0.4504	0.2430	0.3613	0.08758
3	11.42	20.38	77.58	386.1	0.14250	0.28390	0.24140	0.10520	0.2597	0.09744	...	14.910	26.50	98.87	567.7	0.20980	0.86630	0.6869	0.2575	0.6638	0.17300
4	20.29	14.34	135.10	1297.0	0.10030	0.13280	0.19800	0.10430	0.1809	0.05883	...	22.540	16.67	152.20	1575.0	0.13740	0.20500	0.4000	0.1625	0.2364	0.07678
...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...	...
564	21.56	22.39	142.00	1479.0	0.11100	0.11590	0.24390	0.13890	0.1726	0.05623	...	25.450	26.40	166.10	2027.0	0.14100	0.21130	0.4107	0.2216	0.2060	0.07115
565	20.13	28.25	131.20	1261.0	0.09780	0.10340	0.14400	0.09791	0.1752	0.05533	...	23.690	38.25	155.00	1731.0	0.11660	0.19220	0.3215	0.1628	0.2572	0.06637
566	16.60	28.08	108.30	858.1	0.08455	0.10230	0.09251	0.05302	0.1590	0.05648	...	18.980	34.12	126.70	1124.0	0.11390	0.30940	0.3403	0.1418	0.2218	0.07820
567	20.60	29.33	140.10	1265.0	0.11780	0.27700	0.35140	0.15200	0.2397	0.07016	...	25.740	39.42	184.60	1821.0	0.16500	0.86810	0.9387	0.2650	0.4087	0.12400
568	7.76	24.54	47.92	181.0	0.05263	0.04362	0.00000	0.00000	0.1587	0.05884	...	9.456	30.37	59.16	268.6	0.08996	0.06444	0.0000	0.0000	0.2871	0.07039